A quick rant, partly to test whether blogging direct from ScribeFire really works.
In my online mistletoe ramblings, I often come across sites that have holly labelled as mistletoe – and they’re nearly all in the US. But how can anyone mistake holly – a prickly-leaved red-berried bush/tree for mistletoe, a totally non-prickly small tree parasite whose characteristic species (not all) have definitively white berries.
I don’t know – but perhaps the clue is in my point that “they’re nearly all in the US” (they did elect Dubya, twice!, and now seemed over-awed by someone who looks like a page in a specsavers catalogue – but no, I must keep politics [if that's what American elections are about] out of this blog!!).
So just who are the culprits on the holly = mistletoe front. Well, a quick google image search brings up CNN as the first offender – with their ‘mistletoe’ pic coming in the first 5 on google. Here’s their pic (from this site)
It’s so clearly holly that you have to wonder about CNN’s grasp of both the natural world and traditional customs. But maybe if CNN are that thick I shouldn’t be surprised about everyone else?
Well, let’s have a quick look at Cafepress, a US-based design-your-own t-shirt, mug, thong etc site which is arguably a bit more grass-roots.
Is it worse or better than google for ‘holly as mistletoe’ when I run a mistletoe search? It’s worse, much worse. First page brings up several holly themed ‘mistletoe’ logos. Cafepress make it difficult to copy them – but here’s one taken from a screen-dump – and I think the caption sums up the problem nicely…